10
(8) has bun discussed with the C.A., Toy, the Bigg Me Palmer.
Ik C.A. cannot verify the report that Imalaya hove included similes prams & mutter can SEAByt fee,
(Tas)
10
Mr Bigg & the Hublack are not convinced that the cratrction of Kai Tak is sufficent mason to ourule the Tey's adjections to creating a precedent which would be difficult to resist & which might cause repercussions on Sarce dept contracts, particularly in SE Asia & TEE.
As Kai Tak is so probelematical No Pulmes I agreed that the Toy
objecting shuld be put to H. Kong. This is the additional rease that H.K. refuse to take stages to inescex xuenue to build
& M
Eng as H.M.G.
agni
fundo
to cover such contingencies
to accept such hatilities there is no need for H.K. to do anything herself. This
arguement
come homes be held in resence for the moment.
The Aft opposite has been cleared with the Tsy, the Bigg & the Palmer,
unfortunately I could not find Mir sidelo them & es a
a reply has to go tonight
I be at oned the diff.
Woll
7/5 atun
1 To Hong Kong (el of 583
W
Gjer
Mr Palmer.
-7-5-51
cil 537 Conj
answ (9)
fil er (10). The Toy's objections to
pasa
15/5/0
the proposal in para
precedent which might the
entarmning, particularly to Service Rept
I of (8) were (a) it would excate
• (b) if anything does
go unay
i H.K.
✓
1416 world
have to foot the bill ̧
As regards (a) the Thy admitted that they had not been able to obtain the commedised news of the sense depto but enquiries within
the "service" parts of the Try had led them to belian He Semers
we could ask them would not welcome such a proposal. Perhaps
to clarify this?
age 10
age 10Page 11
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.